5 I will discuss two possible objections against this account. In reply to the objection that control theories are too broad because they imply that privacy is lost in cases in which this is, intuitively, false, I will present and develop what I will call the source control account of privacy. 3 I will argue that there is room for the idea that exercising a certain kind of control never diminishes one’s privacy. Section 2 will present Lundgren’s objection. Even though my discussion is structured as a reply to Lundgren’s paper, the result will be of more general interest because he relies on objections and ideas that have been around for a long time. The aim of this paper is to defend the thesis that privacy is, essentially, a kind of control by proposing a new way to understand the relevant kind of control. Moreover, he says that accounts that meet both challenges are not real control accounts. Most recently, Lundgren ( 2020) combined two independent and well-known challenges for control accounts into one dilemma: he argues that the best attempt to meet the first challenge is incompatible with the best attempt to meet the second challenge. Even though control accounts are often presented as the standard views on privacy, there are powerful objections against them. This is the common idea shared by what I will call control accounts of privacy. Many authors have argued that privacy is essentially a certain kind of control.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |